National ID Card
Does the US really need a national identification card? The concept is that everyone would have a card, much like a driver's license, that you have to carry with you and that would identify you to any federal or state agent. Personally, I don't care for the idea, but the question is will it make us safer, and if so is the price worth it?
It's not that radical of idea, really. National ID cards are standard practice in much of continental Europe, and Tony Blair is trying to introduce them in the UK as well. In Germany and France everyone is required to carry their National ID card with them. It also allows them to travel within Europe without a passport, and it gives them the security of knowing that there is one form of identification that everyone must have, therefore nobody can hide.
My instincts rebel against the idea, because I'm one of those people that believes that absolute power corrupts absolutely, and that in fact its a sliding scale. The more power one has, the greater the temptation to abuse it, and the less anyone else can do about it. Thus, I naturally rebel against handing the government more information (knowledge is power) without good reason.
Of course, that being said, if there is a good reason, I'm willing to give up some of my civil liberties in order to protect the greater good. But so far no compelling case has been made. The only way that a National ID card would stop illegal immigrants or terrorists is if you had federal agents stopping people actively at all times in all places, checking their ID cards. That's a police state - which I guarantee you Americans will not settle for. However if you just want people to produce this card when they have to conduct business (like, for example, signing up for pilot lessons), then I don't see why it's any different from having a fake driver's license, or a passport for that matter. If you want a national identification number, use people's SS# instead, or their passport number.
To further these arguments, there is also (scary) prospect of what is behind these ID cards....which is a database with everyone's personal information on it, including biometric data and personal history. Having this information scattered is a form of protection, consolidating it would be very scary. Some citizens choose to assert that if you don't break the law, then you should not have to worry. These people are making a large assumption: that the government will not abuse this data illegaly or unethically for it's own ends. I simply don't believe that.
I know many countries have been doing this for a long time in order to control immigration, and kudos to them if it works. But in my mind it's more the intrasigence of different organizations when it comes to sharing data and communicating than the lack of national ID card that is hindering our ability to monitor that stuff accurately. This quick fix will not solve the problem.
I just don't see any reason to introduce a new card, with a new number, to add to the beaurocracy that already clouds and slows our government. Bottom line: there's no evidence that it will improve either immigration or counter-terrorism. If someone can show it to me, I'm keeping an open mind here.
Does the US really need a national identification card? The concept is that everyone would have a card, much like a driver's license, that you have to carry with you and that would identify you to any federal or state agent. Personally, I don't care for the idea, but the question is will it make us safer, and if so is the price worth it?
It's not that radical of idea, really. National ID cards are standard practice in much of continental Europe, and Tony Blair is trying to introduce them in the UK as well. In Germany and France everyone is required to carry their National ID card with them. It also allows them to travel within Europe without a passport, and it gives them the security of knowing that there is one form of identification that everyone must have, therefore nobody can hide.
My instincts rebel against the idea, because I'm one of those people that believes that absolute power corrupts absolutely, and that in fact its a sliding scale. The more power one has, the greater the temptation to abuse it, and the less anyone else can do about it. Thus, I naturally rebel against handing the government more information (knowledge is power) without good reason.
Of course, that being said, if there is a good reason, I'm willing to give up some of my civil liberties in order to protect the greater good. But so far no compelling case has been made. The only way that a National ID card would stop illegal immigrants or terrorists is if you had federal agents stopping people actively at all times in all places, checking their ID cards. That's a police state - which I guarantee you Americans will not settle for. However if you just want people to produce this card when they have to conduct business (like, for example, signing up for pilot lessons), then I don't see why it's any different from having a fake driver's license, or a passport for that matter. If you want a national identification number, use people's SS# instead, or their passport number.
To further these arguments, there is also (scary) prospect of what is behind these ID cards....which is a database with everyone's personal information on it, including biometric data and personal history. Having this information scattered is a form of protection, consolidating it would be very scary. Some citizens choose to assert that if you don't break the law, then you should not have to worry. These people are making a large assumption: that the government will not abuse this data illegaly or unethically for it's own ends. I simply don't believe that.
I know many countries have been doing this for a long time in order to control immigration, and kudos to them if it works. But in my mind it's more the intrasigence of different organizations when it comes to sharing data and communicating than the lack of national ID card that is hindering our ability to monitor that stuff accurately. This quick fix will not solve the problem.
I just don't see any reason to introduce a new card, with a new number, to add to the beaurocracy that already clouds and slows our government. Bottom line: there's no evidence that it will improve either immigration or counter-terrorism. If someone can show it to me, I'm keeping an open mind here.
