The Man Who Would Be King
I recently saw "The Man Who Would Be King", a charming film starring the young and energetic actors Sean Connery and Michael Caine and based on the short story by Rudyard Kipling.
If you like Kipling's stories about India, if you like Sean Connery or Michael Caine, and if you're interested in adventure movies in the 70's style, then you'll love this movie. Chances are if you like any one or two of the above factors you'll like this move despite the unwanted third.
Sean and Michael play two former officers in the British army. No longer part of the army, they dismiss the idea of returning to Britain and instead concoct a fantastic scheme to travel to 'Kafiristan' (from what i could gather, somwhere around modern day Tajikistan) and become Kings by using their rifles to join with a warring tribe and take over the land.
The script is well written, with a lot of comedy that balances the adventure elements nicely to make for an entertaining movie. The scenery is great - not sure where they shot this movie, but the depiction of Kafiristan is beautiful. However, this movie is all about the acting. Sean Connery is wonderful as a rogue spirit with an impetuous nature and a talent for acting crazy, and Michael Caine is oddly endearing as someone with great military discipline but little moral value. The two characters weave their way through the story with ease and enjoyment, which makes the movie fun to watch.
As is probably obvious at this point, I had very few gripes with this flick. Perhaps some of the props were a little fake looking, and I did think the ending was overly dramatic. Somehow though, I found the cheeziness of this movie made it that much more enjoyable - much like the cheeziness of the Indiania Jones movies.
Good movies, good times.
I recently saw "The Man Who Would Be King", a charming film starring the young and energetic actors Sean Connery and Michael Caine and based on the short story by Rudyard Kipling.
If you like Kipling's stories about India, if you like Sean Connery or Michael Caine, and if you're interested in adventure movies in the 70's style, then you'll love this movie. Chances are if you like any one or two of the above factors you'll like this move despite the unwanted third.
Sean and Michael play two former officers in the British army. No longer part of the army, they dismiss the idea of returning to Britain and instead concoct a fantastic scheme to travel to 'Kafiristan' (from what i could gather, somwhere around modern day Tajikistan) and become Kings by using their rifles to join with a warring tribe and take over the land.
The script is well written, with a lot of comedy that balances the adventure elements nicely to make for an entertaining movie. The scenery is great - not sure where they shot this movie, but the depiction of Kafiristan is beautiful. However, this movie is all about the acting. Sean Connery is wonderful as a rogue spirit with an impetuous nature and a talent for acting crazy, and Michael Caine is oddly endearing as someone with great military discipline but little moral value. The two characters weave their way through the story with ease and enjoyment, which makes the movie fun to watch.
As is probably obvious at this point, I had very few gripes with this flick. Perhaps some of the props were a little fake looking, and I did think the ending was overly dramatic. Somehow though, I found the cheeziness of this movie made it that much more enjoyable - much like the cheeziness of the Indiania Jones movies.
Good movies, good times.
Labels: Entertainment/News
